The Effect Of Giving A Vibrator With A Cooler On Pain Level In Childhood With Venipuncture In Tidore Kepulauan Hospital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36408/mhjcm.v10i2.870Keywords:
Atraumatic care, pain, children, cooling vibrator, venipunctureAbstract
BACKGROUND : Atraumatic care is therapeutic care that is carried out as part of an intervention to remove or suppress psychological or physical stress suffered by a child. The act of minimizing pain, stress and trauma to children when given at the time of blood collection is part of the principle of atraumatic care. One of the atraumatic actions that can be performed on children is the use of a vibrator with a cooler to minimize pain when stabbing a vein
AIMS : to determine the effectiveness of giving a vibrator accompanied by a cold compress against pain in children when taking venous blood.
METHODS : The design of this research is true experimental with a post-test only control group design. Researchers divided into 2 groups, namely the intervention and control groups were taken randomly. Then the researcher made a vibrator with a cooler that had been previously tested on 30 adults, then after being declared to have passed the ethical study it would be applied to children when taking venous blood, assessing children's pain using the FLACC instrument (face, legs, activity, cry and controllability). The study was conducted at the Tidore Islands Hospital. Data processing was carried out previously by testing the homogeneity and normality test, if normally distributed it will use the independent t-test to assess the difference in the average of the two groups, while if it is not normally distributed it will be tested with Mann-Whitney.
RESULT : The results of this study indicate that the characteristics of respondents according to age are mostly 4 years old. In the control group the average age of children is 3.87 while in the intervention group the average age of children is 3.93. Most of the experience of having blood drawn in both groups had blood drawn before. Based on gender characteristics, most of the control and intervention groups were women. There are differences in pain scores in the control and intervention groups. The mean pain score in the intervention group was 3.13 and the mean pain score in the control group was 7.87. The results of statistical tests using Mann Whitney showed that there was a significant difference in pain during venipuncture in the intervention group and the control group (p=0.013).
CONCLUSION : The results of the statistical test show that there was a significant difference in pain in the intervention group and the control group (p=0.013). The use of a cooling vibrator can be an alternative to reduce pain in children during venipuncture.
Downloads
References
1. Kyle T. Essentials of Pediatric Nursing. Vol. 32, Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer. Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer; 1932. 1220 p.
2. Vaajoki A. We have to take Pain Definition, Pain Management, and the Results of Non-pharmacological Studies Seriously. Altern Integr Med. 2013;02(07).
3. Wong, D.L., Hockenberry, M., Wilson, D., Winkelstein, M.L. & SP. Buku ajar keperawatan pediatric. (Edisi 6). 2009.
4. Kennedy RM, Luhmann J, Zempsky WT. Clinical Implications of Unmanaged Needle-Insertion Pain and Distress in Children. Pediatrics. 2008;122(SUPPL. 3).
5. Dochter. Nursing Intervention, Classification (NIC) Sixth Edition. USA MosbyIN. 2013;
6. Potter PA & PA. Fundamental of Nursing. Jaypee Brother Med Publ. 2010;
7. Waterhouse MR, Liu DR, Wang VJ. Cryotherapeutic topical analgesics for pediatric intravenous catheter placement: Ice versus vapocoolant spray. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013;29(1):8–12.
8. Bowden VR, Greenberg CS. Children and Their Families: The Continuum of Care: The Continuum of Care. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins [Internet]. 2007; Available from: http://www.lob.de/cgi-bin/work/suche2?titnr=242229337&flag=citavi
9. Wente SJK. Nonpharmacologic Pediatric Pain Management in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Emerg Nurs. 2013;39(2):140–50.
10. Baxter AL, Cohen LL, McElvery HL, Lawson ML, von Baeyer CL. An Integration of Vibration and Cold Relieves Venipuncture Pain in a Pediatric Emergency Department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011;27(12):1151–6.
11. Yoon WY, Chung SP, Lee HS, Park YS. Analgesic pretreatment for antibiotic skin test: vapocoolant spray vs ice cube. Am J Emerg Med. 2008;26(1):59–61.
12. Rn HL, Rn MB. Use of Cold and Vibration During IV Insertion in Pediatric Patients. 2012;(2008):2008. Available from: www.advocatehealth.com/
13. Srouji. Pain in children: assessment and nonpharmacological management. Int J Peditrics. 2010;
14. Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing Research: Principles and Methods - Denise F. Polit, Cheryl Tatano Beck - Google Books [Internet]. Nursing research: Principles and methods. 2014. Available from: https://books.google.lk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=5g6VttYWnjUC&oi=fnd&pg=PA3&dq=Polit+D.F.+%26+Hungler+B.P.+(1999)+Nursing+Research:+Principles+and+Methods.+6th+ed.+Philadelphia.+Lippincott.&ots=_0nUqJnoxD&sig=ugHO1NUXcUPiFOzag2tMYNx3g9o&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&
15. Canbulat N, Ayhan F, Inal S. Effectiveness of External Cold and Vibration for Procedural Pain Relief During Peripheral Intravenous Cannulation in Pediatric Patients. Pain Manag Nurs. 2015;16(1):33–9.
16. Inal S, Kelleci M. Distracting children during blood draw: Looking through distraction cards is effective in pain relief of children during blood draw. Int J Nurs Pract. 2012;18(2):210–9.
17. Baxter AL, Leong T, Mathew B. External thermomechanical stimulation versus vapocoolant for adult venipuncture pain: Pilot data on a novel device. Clin J Pain. 2009;25(8):705–10.
18. Laksmi IGAPS, Suryati NM, Yanti NLGP. Pengaruh Kompres Dinginterhadap Tingkat Nyeri Saat Pemasangan Infus Pada Anak Usia Sekolah. Bali Med J. 2018;5(2):198–209.
19. Lingga Liwa Ati. Pengaruh Kompres Es Terhadap Tingkat Nyeri Saat Imunisasi Campak Pada Bayi Usia 9 Bulan di Desa Sanggung Sukoharjo. 2016.
20. Mariyam. Tingkat Nyeri Anak Usia 7-13 Tahun Saat Dilakukan Pemasangan Infus di RSUD Semarang. 2013;
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Fadila Abdullah, Nursanti Anwar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyrights Notice
Copyrights:
Researchers publishing manuscrips at Medica Hospitalis: Journal of Clinical Medicine agree with regulations as follow:
Copyrights of each article belong to researchers, and it is likewise the patent rights
Researchers admit that Medica Hospitalia: Journal of Clinical Medicine has the right of first publication
Researchers may submit manuscripts separately, manage non exclusive distribution of published manuscripts into other versions (such as: being sent to researchers’ institutional repository, publication in the books, etc), admitting that manuscripts have been firstly published at Medica Hospitalia: Journal of Clinical Medicine
License:
Medica Hospitalia: Journal of Clinical Medicine is disseminated based on provisions of Creative Common Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 Internasional It allows individuals to duplicate and disseminate manuscripts in any formats, to alter, compose and make derivatives of manuscripts for any purpose. You are not allowed to use manuscripts for commercial purposes. You should properly acknowledge, reference links, and state that alterations have been made. You can do so in proper ways, but it does not hint that the licensors support you or your usage.
